Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Why does the organisation’s IT Strategy go wrong?


In this era of economic fragility and ferocious competition, often IT takes the biggest hit when companies attempt to curb the costs. It wont be wrong to say that it is a totally foregone debate how important is IT for the success of any company. Despite the adverse economic ambience, IT remains fastest growing outlays for most of the companies.


Mostly companies fail to understand the business needs and thus end up wasting resources on services/projects which do not meet the business requirements. The scrimmage over the allocation of resources leaves IT and its business clients (which may be different department within the same company or altogether external clients) in delirium. Companies invest a lot of time, money and resources on IT projects which are actually irrelevant or not of much relevance for the business needs. IT strategy within any company cannot exist in isolation. In order to attain strategic alignment, it becomes paramount to list down lucidly the business objectives/goals through IT-business coordination and collaboration. Each of the ongoing and upcoming IT projects needs to be evaluated under the microscope for its relevance to business, cost of project, resources and time required and of course the risks involved. Based on the parameters such as regulatory necessities, business criticality, etc., all the projects should be segregated into “must do”, “good to have” and “can be postponed” categories.

For any company, the key questions to be asked are – is there a clear IT strategy for the firm? Does it align with the business goal/strategy? Whether IT services for the company is captive or outsourced, the organisations must check the IT spending because many companies get IT driven or are struck with IT wave. Many companies often find their IT expenditure skyrocketing and the stiff challenge they face is to curb the IT expenditure. In doing so, they generally cut the expenditure haphazardly, curbing many critical IT projects hurting the business. This calls for robust tracking tools to monitor IT usage, making IT expenditure more transparent. It is also required that companies periodically relook their IT and find whether they are using technologies/software which are outdated as they do for their operatives in other departments. As we might have witnessed, legacy systems continue to exist in many big organisations e.g. many banks still maintain their databases in mainframes. On one hand mainframes are supposed to be most secure, on other their maintenance costs are very high which is why organisations are migrating possible applications from legacy systems to open systems or rather new platforms which offers safe, secure environment– having low maintenance costs. The organisations should regularly perform IT security and risk assessment. This leads to the complexity of maintenance, migration and upgrade of company’s initial base of IT assets. Streamlining the entire system, considerably, simplifies the businesses’ underlying IT need.



The role of IT is to enable the business by ensuring that there is a strong and clear relationship between IT investment decisions and the organization’s overall strategies, goals, and objectives. To achieve this, organisations must ensure that IT funding and solutions align with business strategies; they must organize IT's financial, technical, and human resources around business value; and they must provide oversight of IT-related activities to manage IT-related risks. Conclusively, in my opinion a company’s IT strategy can be successful if it is able to answer following key questions (which they, often, dont):
  •  Is there a clear IT strategy aligned with the business strategy, goal and objectives?
  • Where is business, voraciously, consuming IT costs and what is driving these costs?
  • Is it easy and efficient (including cost-effective) to implement IT changes or new IT infrastructure?
  •  Are there clear procedures/tools to monitor IT expenditure and are they enforced?

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Does India need social revolution to eradicate social parasites?


Multiple international and domestic media reported and for a moment, we also assumed that the horrible Delhi attack could prove a turning point for India's women as well as the Indian society. But things stand more or less same. Myriad (mis)incidents have occured since then. A society, where the fear of wrongdoing is absent, can never get rid of social evils. Why do the social parasites such as Raj Thackeray, Owaisi, Asharam Bapu and many more prosper? Few doing trade of hatred, few prospering in the name of God, few doing business of ethics and so on. They all know - despite all the wrongdoing in daylight - they will not be convicted and will walk free untouched and unruffled. When we introspect - who is responsible for all these - is it the lame government (no matter who is heading it) or us who elected them?


What is the solution of all these? Do we need a social revolution which will transform the society and thus eradicate the social evils in the entire nation. When Anna Hazare led campaign against corruption - we thought that was the one. We had similar feeling after the nationwide agitation against the Delhi gang-rape but these have become as periodic and repetitive as these heinous crimes. Moreover, this is the only way civilized citizens can exhibit their frustration and agony because we dont belong to the same class as these social parasites do.

I, candidly, don’t know who is the culprit, whom to blame and what is the solution but what I firmly know is that whenever I say I am Indian – these heinous acts, which occur everyday, haunt me – countless rapes, relentless politicians doing scandals, hatred speeches just to preserve vote-bank and many more. Do we wish to live in such India or did we ever dream of such India. A UN index in 2011 amalgamated details on female education and employment, women in politics, sexual and maternal health and more. It ranked India 134th out of 187 countries, worse than Saudi Arabia, Iraq or China. In corruption, India is ranked much ahead of most of the nations. Intellectuals may argue and suggest to look at our neighbouring countries, we are much ahead compared to most of them. So my counterargument is do we really look up to live in such ambience where people are deprived of freedom of speech, social media and many similar privileges which we enjoy  OR we boast of a nation which will have biggest economy, total literacy and a crime-free society. Do campaigns, agitation, outrage, microblogging and expressing opinions make any difference? – I don’t have an answer. Certainly, the transformation cannot be done overnight and the journey, indeed, is long. As for now, I can only hope for the best..!!!